Umesh Prakashchand Jaiswal vs Kisanlal Bansilal Jaiswal Advocate - DESHPANDE S. M. — 1000112/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforPossessionandInjunction. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN090001662009
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1000112/2009
Filing Date
03-10-2009
Registration No
1000112/2009
Registration Date
03-10-2009
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur
Judge
5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umesh Prakashchand Jaiswal
Adv. MANTRI B.S.
Jitendra Rajendrakumar Jaiswal
Adv. SD Deshpande
Kunal Anantkumar Jaiswal
Adv. SD Deshpande
Respondent(s)
Kisanlal Bansilal Jaiswal Advocate - DESHPANDE S. M.
Prakashchandra Kishanlal Jaiswal
Adv. S.M Deshpande
Raghuveer Prakashchandra Jaiswal
Adv. S.M Deshpande
Shailaja Pravinkumar Jaiswal
Adv. S.M Deshpande
Jayshri Shankarbabu Shivhare
Vijayalaxmi Amitkumar Jaiswal
Ashadevi Prakashchandra Jaiswal
Surendra Kishanlal Jaiswal
Adv. MR Deshpande
Bharat Surendra Jaiswal
Adv. MR Deshpande
Renuka Anandbabu Pardeshi
Nayana Nirajbabu Jaiswal
Priya Nitin Jaiswal
Adv. MR Deshpande
Urmilabai Surendra Jaiswal
Adv. MR Deshpande
Rajendra Kishanlal Jaiswal
Adv. SJ Khadke
Yetendra Rajendra Jaiswal
Dipti Rajendra Jaiswal
Shilabai Rajendra Jaiswal
Adv. SJ Khadke
Anantkumar Kishanlal Jaiswal
Komal Anantkumar Jaiswal
Kabir Anantkumar Jaiswal
Minakshi Anantkumar Jaiswal
Yogeshkumar Kishanlal Jaiswal
Adv. TGJ
Rajat Kishanlal Jaiswal
Adv. TGJ
Purva Yogeshkumar Jaiswal
Adv. T.G.Jadhav
Amruta Yogeshkumar Jaiswal
Adv. T.G.Jadhav
Chhayadevi Kishorkumar Jaiswal
Archana Anilkumar Chaukas
Rajendrakumar Kishorkumar Jaiswal
Surekha Rajendrakumar Jaiswal
Puja Niteshkumar Jaiswal
Piyush Rajendrakumar Jaiswal
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Judgment |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 112/2009 (Umesh v. Kisanlal) The plaintiff's application to reinduct Respondent No. 6 (Ms. Vijayalakshmi Jaiswal) as a defendant was dismissed. The court held that Ms. Jaiswal had previously been included as a necessary party on the plaintiff's request, but the plaintiff failed to properly serve her notice despite multiple opportunities, resulting in the case being dismissed against her. The court ruled that the plaintiff cannot now reinduct her under CPC Order 1 Rule 10, as doing so would constitute misuse of court procedures. The plaintiff remains responsible for any future complications arising from this omission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 112/2009 (Umesh v. Kisanlal) The plaintiff's application to reinduct Respondent No. 6 (Ms. Vijayalakshmi Jaiswal) as a defendant was dismissed. The court held that Ms. Jaiswal had previously been included as a necessary party on the plaintiff's request, but the plaintiff failed to properly serve her notice despite multiple opportunities, resulting in the case being dismissed against her. The court ruled that the plaintiff cannot now reinduct her under CPC Order 1 Rule 10, as doing so would constitute misuse of court procedures. The plaintiff remains responsible for any future complications arising from this omission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts