Rajasbai Jonson Srisunder vs Yosef Kerji Gaikwad — 2/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,11. Status: Stayed by District Court. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHJN090000862017

Stayed by District Court

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

12/2017

Filing Date

02-02-2017

Registration No

2/2017

Registration Date

02-02-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur

Judge

5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 21,11

Petitioner(s)

Rajasbai Jonson Srisunder

Adv. DHILPE A.R.

Keshrbai Baburao Jagdhane

Jerasbai Gunwantrao Aathwale

Respondent(s)

Yosef Kerji Gaikwad

Sunil Ratnakar Gaikwad

Adv. BORDE S. L.

Anil Ratnakar Gaikwad

Arun Ratnakar Gaikwad

Vaibhav Uttam Gaikwad

Padmakar Keruji Gaikwad

Prbhakar Keruji Gaikwad

Dwarkabai Srirang Naikwade

Parmeshwar Srirang Naikwade

Nalini Parmeshwar Naikwade

Vinit Nandkishor Sahani

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Badnapur

08-06-2026

Stayed by District Court

09-05-2026

Stayed by District Court

24-04-2026

Stayed by District Court

10-04-2026

Stayed by District Court

27-03-2026

Stayed by District Court

Interim Orders

02-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 2/2017 - Rajasbhai vs. Yosef The court rejected both applications seeking stay of execution of a 2009 partition decree for agricultural land in Jalna district. The court held that once an appeal is filed before the appellate court, the executing court lacks jurisdiction to stay execution without a specific stay order from the appellate court. Since no such order was produced despite the appeal pending for nine years, execution proceedings will continue, with the objector-petitioner required to lead evidence supporting their objection petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 2/2017 - Rajasbhai vs. Yosef The court rejected both applications seeking stay of execution of a 2009 partition decree for agricultural land in Jalna district. The court held that once an appeal is filed before the appellate court, the executing court lacks jurisdiction to stay execution without a specific stay order from the appellate court. Since no such order was produced despite the appeal pending for nine years, execution proceedings will continue, with the objector-petitioner required to lead evidence supporting their objection petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Badnapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case