The State of Maharashtra vs Vasant Motiram Thamake — 284/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN080013612022

Filing Number

747/2022

Filing Date

09-Dec-2022

Registration No

284/2022

Registration Date

09-Dec-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

365

Police Station

Ghansavangi

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasant Motiram Thamake

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Marotirao Thamake (SCC 284/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt/grievous hurt) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 134/177. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused drove the ambulance rashly and negligently, noting critical evidentiary gaps: key witnesses admitted not witnessing the accident, the injured party provided contradictory statements, no medical evidence was produced despite claimed injuries, and no identification parade was conducted despite the witnesses not knowing the accused beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  14. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  15. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  16. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  17. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  18. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  19. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  20. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  21. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  23. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  25. 26-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  26. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  27. 27-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  28. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  29. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  30. 16-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  31. 09-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  32. 09-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 09-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 284/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Marotirao Thamake (SCC 284/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt/grievous hurt) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 134/177. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused drove the ambulance rashly and negligently, noting critical evidentiary gaps: key witnesses admitted not witnessing the accident, the injured party provided contradictory statements, no medical evidence was produced despite claimed injuries, and no identification parade was conducted despite the witnesses not knowing the accused beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case