The State of Maharashtra vs Vasant Motiram Thamake — 284/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN080013612022
Filing Number
747/2022
Filing Date
09-12-2022
Registration No
284/2022
Registration Date
09-12-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
365
Police Station
Ghansavangi
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vasant Motiram Thamake
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Marotirao Thamake (SCC 284/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt/grievous hurt) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 134/177. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused drove the ambulance rashly and negligently, noting critical evidentiary gaps: key witnesses admitted not witnessing the accident, the injured party provided contradictory statements, no medical evidence was produced despite claimed injuries, and no identification parade was conducted despite the witnesses not knowing the accused beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Marotirao Thamake (SCC 284/2022) The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338 (rash/negligent driving causing hurt/grievous hurt) and Motor Vehicle Act Section 134/177. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused drove the ambulance rashly and negligently, noting critical evidentiary gaps: key witnesses admitted not witnessing the accident, the injured party provided contradictory statements, no medical evidence was produced despite claimed injuries, and no identification parade was conducted despite the witnesses not knowing the accused beforehand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts