The State of Maharashtra vs Madhukar Kanthalu Gadhekar — 60/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 26th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN080005222023
Filing Number
222/2023
Filing Date
20-Apr-2023
Registration No
60/2023
Registration Date
20-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
128
Police Station
Ghansavangi
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Madhukar Kanthalu Gadhekar
-
2.Rambhau Madhukar Gadhekar
-
3.Ashabai Madhukar Gadhekar
-
4.Meera Rambhau Gadhekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of Judgment
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Kanthalu Gadhekar & Others (RCC 60/2023) The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, and 504 (causing hurt and criminal intimidation) due to insufficient and unreliable prosecution evidence. The court found critical evidentiary gaps: witness testimonies lacked specificity about which body parts were injured and how; the key seizure panchnama had defects (wrong witness name and missing signature); no independent eye witnesses corroborated the family witnesses' accounts; and material evidence like blood-stained clothes were not seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
24-Apr-2026
Citation
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
29-Sep-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
01-Jul-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
16-May-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2025
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2024
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
30-Nov-2024
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
18-Oct-2024
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
27-Sep-2024
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2024
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
24-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Oct-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
08-Sep-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
03-Aug-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
28-Jun-2023
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
20-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2023
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Kanthalu Gadhekar & Others (RCC 60/2023) The court acquitted all three accused persons of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, and 504 (causing hurt and criminal intimidation) due to insufficient and unreliable prosecution evidence. The court found critical evidentiary gaps: witness testimonies lacked specificity about which body parts were injured and how; the key seizure panchnama had defects (wrong witness name and missing signature); no independent eye witnesses corroborated the family witnesses' accounts; and material evidence like blood-stained clothes were not seized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts