Ankush Asaram Anpat vs Mohan Narayan Anpat Advocate - RAUT S. S. — 90/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN080004842018
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
154/2018
Filing Date
07-09-2018
Registration No
90/2018
Registration Date
07-09-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ankush Asaram Anpat
Adv. KOLHE N.G.
Babasaheb Asaram Anpat
Adv. KOLHE N.G.
Respondent(s)
Mohan Narayan Anpat Advocate - RAUT S. S.
Rameshwar Jagganath Nimbalkar
Adv. RAUT S. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 07-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 90/2018 Outcome: Interim injunction application granted. The Civil Judge (Ghansawangi) ruled in favor of plaintiffs Ankush Asaram Anpat and Babasaheb Asaram Anpat, finding they established a prima-facie case of unlawful interference with their agricultural land possession. The court temporarily restrained defendants Mohan Narayan Anpat and Rameshwar Jagganath Nimbalkar from causing any interference with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the suit property (agricultural land in Mangujalgaon) until final disposal of the suit, notwithstanding the defendants' counterclaim regarding a common boundary cart way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 90/2018 Outcome: Interim injunction application granted. The Civil Judge (Ghansawangi) ruled in favor of plaintiffs Ankush Asaram Anpat and Babasaheb Asaram Anpat, finding they established a prima-facie case of unlawful interference with their agricultural land possession. The court temporarily restrained defendants Mohan Narayan Anpat and Rameshwar Jagganath Nimbalkar from causing any interference with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the suit property (agricultural land in Mangujalgaon) until final disposal of the suit, notwithstanding the defendants' counterclaim regarding a common boundary cart way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts