Kadir Biban Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghansawangi — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN080004152026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Ghansavangi

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kadir Biban Shaikh

    Adv. KALE R. B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghansawangi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Kadir Biban Shaikh's application for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero pickup truck, finding him to be the lawful possessor based on sale agreement and supporting affidavits from previous owners. The vehicle was released to the applicant upon execution of a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he maintain the property, not transfer it without court permission, and produce it as directed until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Kadir Biban Shaikh's application for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero pickup truck, finding him to be the lawful possessor based on sale agreement and supporting affidavits from previous owners. The vehicle was released to the applicant upon execution of a ₹2,50,000 indemnity bond, with conditions that he maintain the property, not transfer it without court permission, and produce it as directed until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case