Amar Shaikh Akbar Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghansawangi — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN080004142026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

259/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Ghansavangi

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amar Shaikh Akbar Shaikh

    Adv. GAIKWAD BALWANT NEMAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Ghansawangi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed Amar Shaikh Akbar Shaikh's application for return of his seized TVS RADEON motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-21-CC-4351), finding he established ownership through registration certificate and Aadhar card. The motorcycle is to be returned pending trial upon execution of an ₹85,000 indemnity bond, with undertakings not to sell/transfer it without court permission and to maintain and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Amar Shaikh Akbar Shaikh's application for return of his seized TVS RADEON motorcycle (Reg. No. MH-21-CC-4351), finding he established ownership through registration certificate and Aadhar card. The motorcycle is to be returned pending trial upon execution of an ₹85,000 indemnity bond, with undertakings not to sell/transfer it without court permission and to maintain and produce it as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case