Kavita Dilip Mathpati vs Savita Durgadas Misal Advocate - KOLHE N.G. — 48/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN080003342019
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
115/2019
Filing Date
24-04-2019
Registration No
48/2019
Registration Date
24-04-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavita Dilip Mathpati
Adv. DESHMUKH R.S.
Respondent(s)
Savita Durgadas Misal Advocate - KOLHE N.G.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 48/2019 Petitioner: Kavita Dilip Mathpati Respondent: Savita Durgadas Misal Advocate - KOLHE N.G. Order Date: 30 August 2022 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The petitioner's appeal seeking recovery of 26 acres of encroached land from Ghat No. 389 was rejected. The court found no grounds to interfere with the existing land records (7/12 extract and Fard No. 4563) which showed the petitioner's spouse's name on 0.44 acres, and dismissed the case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Rule 17. The petitioner was directed to bear her own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 48/2019 Petitioner: Kavita Dilip Mathpati Respondent: Savita Durgadas Misal Advocate - KOLHE N.G. Order Date: 30 August 2022 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The petitioner's appeal seeking recovery of 26 acres of encroached land from Ghat No. 389 was rejected. The court found no grounds to interfere with the existing land records (7/12 extract and Fard No. 4563) which showed the petitioner's spouse's name on 0.44 acres, and dismissed the case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Rule 17. The petitioner was directed to bear her own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts