Shivnanda Dilip Dhurat vs Dilip Kisan Dhurat Advocate - WAGDARE S. J. — 8/2022

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,22,23. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHJN080002432022

Filing Number

173/2022

Filing Date

28-Mar-2022

Registration No

8/2022

Registration Date

29-Mar-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivnanda Dilip Dhurat

    Adv. UDHAN V. D.

  2. 2.Pragati Dilip Dhurat

  3. 3.Aditya Dilip Dhurat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Kisan Dhurat Advocate - WAGDARE S. J.

  2. 2.Kisan Begaji Dhurat

  3. 3.Nanda Kisan Dhurat

  4. 4.Vikas Narayan Dhurat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: PWDVA No.08/2022 - Shivnanda & Ors. v. Dilip & Ors. The court found that applicant No.1 (wife) proved domestic violence including physical abuse, beatings, dowry demands (Rs.50,000), and suspicion about her chastity by respondent No.1 (husband) and family members. The court granted a protection order prohibiting further violence and ordered respondent No.1 to pay Rs.3,000 monthly maintenance to applicant No.1 only, rejecting maintenance claims for the other applicants (daughter already married; son with respondent). The court denied the Rs.5 lakh compensation claim due to insufficient documentary evidence of specific damages, despite finding domestic violence occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  7. 14-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  14. 15-May-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  16. 27-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  17. 01-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  19. 09-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  20. 01-Jan-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  21. 19-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  22. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  23. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  24. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  25. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  26. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  27. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  29. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  30. 01-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  31. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  32. 21-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C

  33. 04-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  34. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  35. 09-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  36. 11-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  37. 10-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  38. 15-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  39. 01-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  40. 15-Jun-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  41. 15-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  42. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  43. 15-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  44. 24-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  45. 27-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  46. 16-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  47. 02-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  48. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  49. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  50. 24-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  51. 02-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  52. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  53. 08-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  54. 25-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  55. 26-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  56. 07-Jul-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  57. 27-Jun-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  58. 04-May-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC

  59. 29-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 28-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PWDVA No.08/2022 - Shivnanda & Ors. v. Dilip & Ors. The court found that applicant No.1 (wife) proved domestic violence including physical abuse, beatings, dowry demands (Rs.50,000), and suspicion about her chastity by respondent No.1 (husband) and family members. The court granted a protection order prohibiting further violence and ordered respondent No.1 to pay Rs.3,000 monthly maintenance to applicant No.1 only, rejecting maintenance claims for the other applicants (daughter already married; son with respondent). The court denied the Rs.5 lakh compensation claim due to insufficient documentary evidence of specific damages, despite finding domestic violence occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case