Manohar Ashruba Shinde vs Mansi @Pallavi d/o Pramod Deshmukh — 15/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 11th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN080001612022
Next Hearing
11th August 2026
Filing Number
35/2022
Filing Date
23-02-2022
Registration No
15/2022
Registration Date
24-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar Ashruba Shinde
Adv. TAUR V. A.
Respondent(s)
Mansi @Pallavi d/o Pramod Deshmukh
Shakuntalabai w/o Dattatraya Deshmukh
Adv. WAGHRULKAR S.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 09-01-2026 | Compliance |
| 31-10-2025 | Compliance |
| 28-08-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 15/2022 Petitioner's Application ALLOWED The court granted the petitioner Manohar Ashruba Shinde's application to be added as Respondent No. 3 in the suit. The petitioner claimed an interest in the disputed agricultural property (plot 188, 61 acres, Jalna district) which was sold to the first respondent under sale deed 3649/2022. The court found the petitioner's legal interest in the property was established and that including them as a party was necessary for proper adjudication. The suit proceedings will continue with the petitioner as an added party respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 15/2022 Petitioner's Application ALLOWED The court granted the petitioner Manohar Ashruba Shinde's application to be added as Respondent No. 3 in the suit. The petitioner claimed an interest in the disputed agricultural property (plot 188, 61 acres, Jalna district) which was sold to the first respondent under sale deed 3649/2022. The court found the petitioner's legal interest in the property was established and that including them as a party was necessary for proper adjudication. The suit proceedings will continue with the petitioner as an added party respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts