Syed Qamroddin Syed Murtuza vs Syed Salim Syed Mirsa Hab Advocate - MANE N. L. — 13/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN080000862020
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
19/2020
Filing Date
27-01-2020
Registration No
13/2020
Registration Date
27-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Syed Qamroddin Syed Murtuza
Adv. DESHMUKH R.S.
Syed Mustafa Syed Murtuza
Syed Naim Syed Murtuza
Syed Gulam Rasool Syed Murtuza
Respondent(s)
Syed Salim Syed Mirsa Hab Advocate - MANE N. L.
Syed Saheb Syed Mirza
Syed Bismilla Syed Mirza
Syed Bhiku Mir Azam Syed Rabbani
Syed Yousuf Syed Ziauddin
Syed Javed Syed Sharfoddin
Syed Atiq Syed Sharfuddin
Syed Murad Syed Sharfuddin
Syed Mujeeb Syed Sharfuddin
Syed Jabbar Syed Zainuddin
Syed Bane Miyan Syed Basha Miyan
Syed Moinuddin Syed Azeemuddin
Syed Moizuddin Syed Azeemoddin
Syed Anis Nizamoddin
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 24-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 06-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 13/2020 (Kamaroddin & Ors vs. Salim & Ors) The court allowed plaintiff No. 4's application to set aside the evidence-closed order that was passed against them on 06.01.2025. The plaintiffs had failed to appear for cross-examination after the court granted them time to do so. However, the court found that in the interest of justice and considering the nature of the suit (for perpetual injunction regarding Darga property), the plaintiffs should be given an opportunity to lead their evidence. The court ordered the evidence-closed order to be set aside subject to payment of Rs. 200/- costs to the defendants as compensation for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 13/2020 (Kamaroddin & Ors vs. Salim & Ors) The court allowed plaintiff No. 4's application to set aside the evidence-closed order that was passed against them on 06.01.2025. The plaintiffs had failed to appear for cross-examination after the court granted them time to do so. However, the court found that in the interest of justice and considering the nature of the suit (for perpetual injunction regarding Darga property), the plaintiffs should be given an opportunity to lead their evidence. The court ordered the evidence-closed order to be set aside subject to payment of Rs. 200/- costs to the defendants as compensation for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts