Rameshchandra Shreekishan Tapadiya vs Vijya w/o Manikchand Tapadiya — 32/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN080000852025
Next Hearing
27th July 2026
e-Filing Number
23-12-2024
Filing Number
51/2025
Filing Date
17-01-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
17-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ghansavangi
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rameshchandra Shreekishan Tapadiya
Adv. DESHMUKH R.S.
Respondent(s)
Vijya w/o Manikchand Tapadiya
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC
Evidence
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 29-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 06-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 27-10-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 32/2025 Rameshchandra Shreekishan Tapadiya v. Vijya w/o Manikchand Tapadiya The petitioner's petition seeking recovery of possession of encroached agricultural land (Plot No. 435) was allowed. The court appointed a Taluka Land Records Inspector as Court Commissioner to measure and identify the encroached land, prepare detailed survey maps, and submit a report by 9 May 2025. Both parties must furnish necessary documents, and survey costs shall be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 32/2025 Rameshchandra Shreekishan Tapadiya v. Vijya w/o Manikchand Tapadiya The petitioner's petition seeking recovery of possession of encroached agricultural land (Plot No. 435) was allowed. The court appointed a Taluka Land Records Inspector as Court Commissioner to measure and identify the encroached land, prepare detailed survey maps, and submit a report by 9 May 2025. Both parties must furnish necessary documents, and survey costs shall be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts