Vidhyadhar Nayba Sadawarte (Power of Attorner) Kiran Gambhir More vs Madhav Limbaji Kuhire Advocate - SAYYAD B. R. — 217/2025

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 217/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction dated 17.10.2025. The plaintiff sought to restrain defendants from obstructing his property and destroying crops while creating an access way. However, the Civil Judge found no prima facie case, as the Tahsildar had already lawfully granted the defendants an approach way through the plaintiff's property (gut No.112) via proper revenue procedure. The balance of convenience favored the defendants, whose ability to harvest crops would be irreparably harmed by granting the injunction. The plaintiff's pending appeal against the Tahsildar's order does not suspend its validity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.