The State of Maharashtra vs Arun Dilip Savde and 1 Advocate - DANDGE M. K. — 121/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN070007572019

Filing Number

522/2019

Filing Date

06-Aug-2019

Registration No

121/2019

Registration Date

13-Aug-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jafarabad

Judge

6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Tembhurni

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arun Dilip Savde and 1 Advocate - DANDGE M. K.

  2. 2.Babasaheb Baburao Savde

    Adv. KASHTE V.B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: RCC 121/2019, State of Maharashtra v. Arun Dilip Savde & Babasaheb Baburao Savde The court acquitted both accused of theft charges under IPC Section 379/34, finding the prosecution proved motor pumps were stolen but failed to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. While witnesses confirmed six pumps went missing from agricultural fields and were later recovered abandoned, the investigating officer admitted no stolen property was seized from the accused, and no eyewitness identified them as perpetrators. The court held that suspicion alone cannot substitute proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  12. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  13. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  15. 01-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  18. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  19. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  20. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  21. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  22. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  23. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  27. 14-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  28. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  29. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  30. 29-Nov-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  31. 01-Sep-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  32. 28-Jun-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  33. 31-Mar-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  34. 14-Feb-2023

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  35. 25-Nov-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  36. 07-Sep-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  37. 16-Aug-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  38. 21-Jun-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  39. 08-Apr-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  40. 24-Feb-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  41. 19-Jan-2022

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  42. 13-Dec-2021

    Charge

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  43. 11-Nov-2021

    Charge

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  44. 09-Sep-2021

    Charge

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  45. 04-Aug-2021

    Charge

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  46. 07-Apr-2021

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  47. 19-Jan-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  48. 28-Oct-2020

    Appearance

  49. 18-Jul-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  50. 07-Apr-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  51. 17-Jan-2020

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  52. 22-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  53. 21-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 06-Aug-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC 121/2019, State of Maharashtra v. Arun Dilip Savde & Babasaheb Baburao Savde The court acquitted both accused of theft charges under IPC Section 379/34, finding the prosecution proved motor pumps were stolen but failed to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. While witnesses confirmed six pumps went missing from agricultural fields and were later recovered abandoned, the investigating officer admitted no stolen property was seized from the accused, and no eyewitness identified them as perpetrators. The court held that suspicion alone cannot substitute proof in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case