Manda Santosh Sonune vs Santosh Shriram Sonune — 69/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

Depositing Amount Next hearing 05-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN070004242025

e-Filing Number

25-03-2025

Filing Number

230/2025

Filing Date

25-Mar-2025

Registration No

69/2025

Registration Date

25-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jafarabad

Judge

6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Jafrabad

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manda Santosh Sonune

    Adv. SORMARE SACHIN SAHEBRAO

  2. 2.Payal Santosh Sonune Under Garden Mother

    Adv. SORMARE SACHIN SAHEBRAO

  3. 3.Yuvraj Santosh Sonune

    Adv. SORMARE SACHIN SAHEBRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Shriram Sonune

Case History

  1. 05-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  3. 22-Jun-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  4. 26-May-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  5. 08-May-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Depositing Amount

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  9. 21-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 69/2025 The court rejected the petitioners' application for a non-bailable warrant against the respondent for maintenance arrears of Rs. 51,000. Instead, the court issued a recovery warrant under Section 461 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering recovery of arrears as a fine and issuing a recovery certificate to the District Collector, as property attachment is the primary recovery mode before coercive detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 23-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Warrant

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  16. 04-Oct-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  19. 31-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  20. 22-May-2025

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 25-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal M.A. No. 69/2025 The court rejected the petitioners' application for a non-bailable warrant against the respondent for maintenance arrears of Rs. 51,000. Instead, the court issued a recovery warrant under Section 461 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering recovery of arrears as a fine and issuing a recovery certificate to the District Collector, as property attachment is the primary recovery mode before coercive detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case