Yunuskha Roshankha Pathan vs State Through Police Station Jafrabad — 48/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN070003472026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

238/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jafarabad

Judge

6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Jafrabad

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yunuskha Roshankha Pathan

    Adv. SHAIKH SADIK SQ AMIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Through Police Station Jafrabad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 48/2026 Summary: The court granted Yunuskha Roshankha Pathan interim custody of his seized Mahindra Supro Minitruck, finding he had proven ownership through valid registration and insurance documents. The applicant was required to execute an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, criminal use, or unauthorized disposal of the vehicle, with the Investigating Officer directed to prepare detailed documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 48/2026 Summary: The court granted Yunuskha Roshankha Pathan interim custody of his seized Mahindra Supro Minitruck, finding he had proven ownership through valid registration and insurance documents. The applicant was required to execute an ₹8,00,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions prohibiting transfer, modification, criminal use, or unauthorized disposal of the vehicle, with the Investigating Officer directed to prepare detailed documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case