Shakilabi Urf Narges Salim Shaikh vs Salim Nasir Shaikh Advocate - SAYYAD B. R. — 3/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,21,22. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHJN070000632022
Filing Number
50/2022
Filing Date
14-01-2022
Registration No
3/2022
Registration Date
14-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Jafarabad
Judge
6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakilabi Urf Narges Salim Shaikh
Adv. SIRSAT S. P.
Respondent(s)
Salim Nasir Shaikh Advocate - SAYYAD B. R.
Nasir Sikandar Shaikh
Saminabi Nasir Shaikh
Saddam Nasir Shaikh
Nilofar Saddam Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shakilabi v. Salim Nasir Shaikh (3/2022) The Judicial Magistrate partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by Shakilabi and her two minor children against her husband and in-laws under the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the husband drove them from the matrimonial house in June 2021 and refused maintenance despite sufficient financial capacity evidenced by owned properties, ordering him to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to each applicant plus legal costs and back arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Shakilabi v. Salim Nasir Shaikh (3/2022) The Judicial Magistrate partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by Shakilabi and her two minor children against her husband and in-laws under the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the husband drove them from the matrimonial house in June 2021 and refused maintenance despite sufficient financial capacity evidenced by owned properties, ordering him to pay Rs. 3,000 monthly to each applicant plus legal costs and back arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts