Pushpa Bhanudas Hiwale vs Bhanudas Eknath Hiwale Advocate - CHAVAN S.R. — 1/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,21,22. Status: Order. Next hearing: 19th August 2026.

Order Next hearing 19-Aug-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHJN070000602023

Filing Number

36/2023

Filing Date

06-Jan-2023

Registration No

1/2023

Registration Date

06-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Jafarabad

Judge

6-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18,19,20,21,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pushpa Bhanudas Hiwale

    Adv. WAHULE G.B.

  2. 2.Rahul Bhanudas Hiwale

  3. 3.Vishnu Bhanudas Hiwale

  4. 4.Madhuri Bhanudas Hiwale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhanudas Eknath Hiwale Advocate - CHAVAN S.R.

  2. 2.Raghunath Eknath Hiwale

  3. 3.Kantabai Eknath Hiwale

  4. 4.Prakash Eknath Hiwale

Case History

  1. 19-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  3. 04-Jul-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  5. 04-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  6. 26-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  7. 05-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Appl. No. 1/2023 Outcome: Application Rejected The non-applicant's application to set aside a "no cross-examination" order passed on 13.08.2025 was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jafrabad on 25.02.2026. The court found that the non-applicant had already been granted multiple opportunities to conduct cross-examination, including a final opportunity on cost of Rs. 1,000, but repeatedly failed to proceed due to lack of diligence. The excuse that counsel was busy with private work was deemed insufficient. The court declined to reopen the stage further, as it would prejudice the applicant who had diligently prosecuted the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  14. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  15. 19-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  16. 01-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  19. 13-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  22. 21-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.

  24. 29-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  25. 22-Mar-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  26. 17-Feb-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  27. 20-Dec-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  28. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  29. 30-Aug-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  30. 20-Jul-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  31. 17-May-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  32. 18-Apr-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  33. 03-Mar-2024

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  34. 31-Jan-2024

    Reply/Say

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  35. 16-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  36. 06-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  37. 27-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  38. 21-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  39. 28-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  40. 30-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  41. 19-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  42. 11-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt.Civil Judge J.D. and JMFC, Jafarabad

  43. 12-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 06-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.W.D.V.A. Appl. No. 1/2023 Outcome: Application Rejected The non-applicant's application to set aside a "no cross-examination" order passed on 13.08.2025 was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jafrabad on 25.02.2026. The court found that the non-applicant had already been granted multiple opportunities to conduct cross-examination, including a final opportunity on cost of Rs. 1,000, but repeatedly failed to proceed due to lack of diligence. The excuse that counsel was busy with private work was deemed insufficient. The court declined to reopen the stage further, as it would prejudice the applicant who had diligently prosecuted the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case