The State Of Maharashtra vs Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad Advocate - KAD P. N. — 781/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A,337,338. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN060020492022
e-Filing Number
11-08-2022
Filing Number
2047/2022
Filing Date
02-09-2022
Registration No
781/2022
Registration Date
02-09-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
83
Police Station
Bhokardan
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad Advocate - KAD P. N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 25-09-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad (Case 781/2022) The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Bhokardan acquitted accused Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad of charges under IPC sections 304-A (death by negligence), 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 338 (causing injury). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused recklessly drove vehicle MH-21-BM-2947 on 11.01.2022, causing the death of Mahadu Maroti Misal and injuring him. Key witness testimony was inconclusive—the complainant acknowledged not witnessing the incident, and other witnesses did not support the prosecution narrative. The investigating officer also failed to appear despite summons. The court held insufficient evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad (Case 781/2022) The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Bhokardan acquitted accused Yogesh Tukaram Gaikwad of charges under IPC sections 304-A (death by negligence), 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 338 (causing injury). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused recklessly drove vehicle MH-21-BM-2947 on 11.01.2022, causing the death of Mahadu Maroti Misal and injuring him. Key witness testimony was inconclusive—the complainant acknowledged not witnessing the incident, and other witnesses did not support the prosecution narrative. The investigating officer also failed to appear despite summons. The court held insufficient evidence to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts