Hiralal Ramchandra Mahore vs Tukaram Bala Koli Advocate - KHARAT P. S. — 700018/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHJN060019212012
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
700018/2012
Filing Date
05-11-2012
Registration No
700018/2012
Registration Date
05-11-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hiralal Ramchandra Mahore
Adv. THAREWAL R.S.
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Bala Koli Advocate - KHARAT P. S.
Damu Gangaram (Died)
Rukhmabai Damu Padle Lrs A
Fakira Damu Padle Lrs B
Hiralal Amarsing Dhunawat
Wastlabai Rama Koli
Adv. KHARAT P. S.
Radho Mahluba Koli (Died)
Anusayabai Ragho Koli Lrs A
Dnyaneshwar Ragho Koli Lrs B
Govinda Ragho Koli Lrs C
Idan Deochand Rajput (Died)
Tarabai Idan Rajput Lrs A
Jaipal Idal Rajput Lts B
Bhika Idal Rajput Lrs C
Balu Ganpat Sonwane(Died)
Kasabai Balu Sonwane Lrs A
Sakharam Balu Sonwane Lrs B
Santosh Balu Sonwane Lrs C
Narayan Hari Koli
Adv. KHARAT P. S.
Namdeo Saluba Gawli (Died)
Shewantabai Saluba Gawli Lrs A
Seetaram Namdeo Gawli Lrs B
Shalikram Namdeo Gawli Lrs C
Namdeo Vithoba Sonwane
Bhujangrao Bhawani Shinde
Saluba Ananda Dhanwai
Laxman Bala Koli
Pashusha Sandusha
Husen Fakira Tadvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Compliance |
| 08-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 24-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 16-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 06-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Reg. D. 18/2012 (Hiralal v. Tukaram) Outcome: The decree holder's application was allowed. The court issued a possession warrant for the encroached property and appointed the Taluka Inspector of Land Records as court commissioner to fix boundaries according to measurements from 1995. Police protection was directed, and detailed panchanama (inspection report) was mandated at execution time, with judgment debtors warned of civil imprisonment if they obstruct the decree execution process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Reg. D. 18/2012 (Hiralal v. Tukaram) Outcome: The decree holder's application was allowed. The court issued a possession warrant for the encroached property and appointed the Taluka Inspector of Land Records as court commissioner to fix boundaries according to measurements from 1995. Police protection was directed, and detailed panchanama (inspection report) was mandated at execution time, with judgment debtors warned of civil imprisonment if they obstruct the decree execution process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts