Dadarao Namdeo Ghyawat vs Uttam Govinda Ghyawat — 768/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN060019072016
Filing Number
1580/2016
Filing Date
19-12-2016
Registration No
768/2016
Registration Date
19-12-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dadarao Namdeo Ghyawat
Adv. SHIRSAT P. T.
Respondent(s)
Uttam Govinda Ghyawat
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 768/2016 Court Decision: The court acquitted Uttam Govinda Ghyawat of all charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 427 on April 18, 2026. The judge found that the complainant Dadarao Namdeo Ghyawat failed to submit independent evidence proving the alleged assault, abusive language, criminal intimidation, and destruction of trees on December 13, 2016. Key Reasoning: The court held that merely alleging facts in the complaint is insufficient to prove guilt; evidence must be properly presented and substantiated. Since no credible documentary evidence was produced to corroborate the allegations, the accused was acquitted under CrPC section 255. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 768/2016 Court Decision: The court acquitted Uttam Govinda Ghyawat of all charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, and 427 on April 18, 2026. The judge found that the complainant Dadarao Namdeo Ghyawat failed to submit independent evidence proving the alleged assault, abusive language, criminal intimidation, and destruction of trees on December 13, 2016. Key Reasoning: The court held that merely alleging facts in the complaint is insufficient to prove guilt; evidence must be properly presented and substantiated. Since no credible documentary evidence was produced to corroborate the allegations, the accused was acquitted under CrPC section 255. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts