Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri vs Chief Municipal Officer Bhokardan Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S. — 139/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 03-Aug-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060015752019

Filing Number

339/2019

Filing Date

03-Oct-2019

Registration No

139/2019

Registration Date

03-Oct-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri

    Adv. TALEKAR R.H.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chief Municipal Officer Bhokardan Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S.

Case History

  1. 03-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  5. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  6. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  7. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  8. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  10. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  11. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  12. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  13. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  14. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  15. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  16. 03-May-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  17. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  18. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  19. 10-Jan-2024

    A. D. R.

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  20. 22-Dec-2023

    A. D. R.

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  21. 28-Nov-2023

    A. D. R.

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  22. 30-Oct-2023

    A. D. R.

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  23. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  24. 29-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  25. 16-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  26. 21-Mar-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary of Case 139/2019 Petitioner: Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri Respondent: Chief Municipal Officer, Bhokardan Outcome: The petition for interim relief (stay of recovery proceedings) was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that the Municipal Corporation validly demanded Rs. 78,980/- in property taxes from the petitioner dated 25/06/2019. However, the court held the petitioner must pursue proper legal remedies under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1965 Section 169 for equitable relief rather than seeking interim relief in this petition. The court noted prior disputes existed between parties regarding property ownership and tax liability, and directed the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for substantive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  28. 18-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  29. 15-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  30. 13-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  31. 09-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  32. 03-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  33. 02-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  34. 28-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  35. 20-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  36. 15-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  37. 27-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  38. 16-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  39. 02-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  40. 16-Dec-2022

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  41. 01-Dec-2022

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  42. 25-Nov-2022

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  43. 10-Nov-2022

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  44. 13-Oct-2022

    Order on Exh

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  45. 12-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  46. 10-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  47. 03-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  48. 28-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  49. 22-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  50. 07-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  51. 23-Aug-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  52. 29-Jul-2022

    Compliance

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  53. 13-Jul-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  54. 07-May-2022

    Reply/Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  55. 04-May-2022

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  56. 29-Apr-2022

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  57. 25-Mar-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  58. 10-Jan-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  59. 30-Nov-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  60. 16-Nov-2021

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  61. 08-Sep-2021

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  62. 23-Jul-2021

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  63. 23-Apr-2021

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  64. 20-Jan-2021

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  65. 10-Dec-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  66. 24-Sep-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  67. 08-Jul-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  68. 13-May-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  69. 04-Apr-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  70. 24-Jan-2020

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  71. 21-Dec-2019

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  72. 18-Nov-2019

    Appearance

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  73. 23-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  74. 16-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  75. 03-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 03-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 139/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 139/2019 Petitioner: Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri Respondent: Chief Municipal Officer, Bhokardan Outcome: The petition for interim relief (stay of recovery proceedings) was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that the Municipal Corporation validly demanded Rs. 78,980/- in property taxes from the petitioner dated 25/06/2019. However, the court held the petitioner must pursue proper legal remedies under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1965 Section 169 for equitable relief rather than seeking interim relief in this petition. The court noted prior disputes existed between parties regarding property ownership and tax liability, and directed the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for substantive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case