Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri vs Chief Municipal Officer Bhokardan Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S. — 139/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN060015752019
Next Hearing
03rd August 2026
Filing Number
339/2019
Filing Date
03-10-2019
Registration No
139/2019
Registration Date
03-10-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri
Adv. TALEKAR R.H.
Respondent(s)
Chief Municipal Officer Bhokardan Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 15-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-09-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 139/2019 Petitioner: Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri Respondent: Chief Municipal Officer, Bhokardan Outcome: The petition for interim relief (stay of recovery proceedings) was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that the Municipal Corporation validly demanded Rs. 78,980/- in property taxes from the petitioner dated 25/06/2019. However, the court held the petitioner must pursue proper legal remedies under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1965 Section 169 for equitable relief rather than seeking interim relief in this petition. The court noted prior disputes existed between parties regarding property ownership and tax liability, and directed the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for substantive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 139/2019 Petitioner: Abdul Jameel Ahmed Abdul Rashid Qadri Respondent: Chief Municipal Officer, Bhokardan Outcome: The petition for interim relief (stay of recovery proceedings) was dismissed. The court found insufficient evidence that the Municipal Corporation validly demanded Rs. 78,980/- in property taxes from the petitioner dated 25/06/2019. However, the court held the petitioner must pursue proper legal remedies under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1965 Section 169 for equitable relief rather than seeking interim relief in this petition. The court noted prior disputes existed between parties regarding property ownership and tax liability, and directed the petitioner to approach appropriate authorities for substantive relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts