Deuba Sakharam Kshirsagar Died(Legal Heir) vs Eknath Tukaram Kshirsagar — 10/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21 R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th April 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHJN060014312023
e-Filing Number
07-07-2023
Filing Number
330/2023
Filing Date
10-07-2023
Registration No
10/2023
Registration Date
10-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Deuba Sakharam Kshirsagar Died(Legal Heir)
Adv. JADHAV D. S.1.
Aarti Sanjay Kshirsgar 1.
Anita Sanjay Kshirsagar 1.
Prabhkar Sanjay Kshirsagar 1.
Puja Sanjay Kshirsagar 1.
Sulochana Jagdish Paithankar
Respondent(s)
Eknath Tukaram Kshirsagar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 07-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 17-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Civil Judge dismissed the execution petition filed by the decree holder (petitioners Deuba Sakharam Kshirsagar and others) against respondent Eknath Tukaram Kshirsagar due to the decree holder's default. The court found that the decree holder had been absent since August 14, 2024, failed to appear when called, and did not take necessary steps to proceed with the petition since December 16, 2025. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Civil Judge dismissed the execution petition filed by the decree holder (petitioners Deuba Sakharam Kshirsagar and others) against respondent Eknath Tukaram Kshirsagar due to the decree holder's default. The court found that the decree holder had been absent since August 14, 2024, failed to appear when called, and did not take necessary steps to proceed with the petition since December 16, 2025. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts