Ranjana Siddharth Salve and 10 vs Sarubai Kaduba Salve and — 163/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060010992023

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

e-Filing Number

09-06-2023

Filing Number

261/2023

Filing Date

12-06-2023

Registration No

163/2023

Registration Date

12-06-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Ranjana Siddharth Salve and 10

Adv. WAGH B. B.

Gita Govinda Gaykwad

Sita Dhammdip Dandage

Surekha Anil Ingale

Amrapali Sandip Dandhage

Lalita Dipak Patil

Manjula Sirddharth Salve

Shobha Sirdhath Salve

Varsha Sandip Shinde

Sanghpal Siddharth Salve

Dhammapal Siddharth Salve GPA Shobha Sidhdhrth Salve

Respondent(s)

Sarubai Kaduba Salve and

Usha Bhagwan Borde

Adv. KHARAT P. S.

Rajendra Manikrao Tangde

Diwyam Ganesh Wagh U/G Ganesh Narayan Wagh

Adv. MEHTA H. H.

Aaryan Kishor Wagh U/G Kishor Narayan Wagh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

29-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

30-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

16-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-03-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case 163/2023 Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction in this partition suit involving joint family property. The court found that plaintiffs (wives and children of deceased Sidharth Salve) established a prima-facie case that the disputed property is joint family property, not self-acquired by defendant no.1 as claimed. The defendants were restrained from alienating the suit property until final disposal of the case, as the court determined plaintiffs would suffer irreparable loss and balance of convenience favored them, given prior unauthorized sales to third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 163/2023 Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction in this partition suit involving joint family property. The court found that plaintiffs (wives and children of deceased Sidharth Salve) established a prima-facie case that the disputed property is joint family property, not self-acquired by defendant no.1 as claimed. The defendants were restrained from alienating the suit property until final disposal of the case, as the court determined plaintiffs would suffer irreparable loss and balance of convenience favored them, given prior unauthorized sales to third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case