Sunita Vishwas Gadekar vs Sahebrao Hariba Gadekar Advocate - TALEKAR K. B., THALE D.S. — 130/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN060010902018
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
251/2018
Filing Date
27-06-2018
Registration No
130/2018
Registration Date
27-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunita Vishwas Gadekar
Adv. SABLE S.M.
Respondent(s)
Sahebrao Hariba Gadekar Advocate - TALEKAR K. B., THALE D.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 130/2018 - Sunita Vishwas Gadekar v. Sahebrao Hariba Gadekar Outcome: Petition Allowed The court accepted the petitioner Sunita's claims regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 167 and 169) and rejected the respondent's contentions. The court found that the lands were ancestral property of the respondent's family, not jointly acquired, and that the petitioner's deceased husband had no share in them. The court dismissed the respondent's false claims and awarded the petitioner maintenance rights and protection of her marital interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 130/2018 - Sunita Vishwas Gadekar v. Sahebrao Hariba Gadekar Outcome: Petition Allowed The court accepted the petitioner Sunita's claims regarding disputed agricultural land (plots 167 and 169) and rejected the respondent's contentions. The court found that the lands were ancestral property of the respondent's family, not jointly acquired, and that the petitioner's deceased husband had no share in them. The court dismissed the respondent's false claims and awarded the petitioner maintenance rights and protection of her marital interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts