Anil Narayan Sonawane vs Ramrao Patilba Pimple Advocate - THAREWAL P. V. — 225/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060008662024

Issues

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-05-2024

Filing Number

335/2024

Filing Date

04-05-2024

Registration No

225/2024

Registration Date

04-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Anil Narayan Sonawane

Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

Respondent(s)

Ramrao Patilba Pimple Advocate - THAREWAL P. V.

Shnfad Ramrao Pimple

Shobhabai Shenfad Pimple

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

24-04-2026

Issues

16-03-2026

A. D. R.

10-02-2026

A. D. R.

19-01-2026

A. D. R.

26-12-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

10-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 225/2024 The court vacated the default order ("kaifiyat") issued against the respondent and allowed the respondent's petition on merits. The respondent had failed to file the required statement within 90 days due to legitimate reasons (adult respondent was away for medical treatment), and the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and admit the statement on record to allow the case to proceed on its substantive merits. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 225/2024 The court vacated the default order ("kaifiyat") issued against the respondent and allowed the respondent's petition on merits. The respondent had failed to file the required statement within 90 days due to legitimate reasons (adult respondent was away for medical treatment), and the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and admit the statement on record to allow the case to proceed on its substantive merits. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case