Anil Narayan Sonawane vs Ramrao Patilba Pimple Advocate - THAREWAL P. V. — 225/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060008662024

e-Filing Number

03-05-2024

Filing Number

335/2024

Filing Date

04-May-2024

Registration No

225/2024

Registration Date

04-May-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Narayan Sonawane

    Adv. DESHPANDE S. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramrao Patilba Pimple Advocate - THAREWAL P. V.

  2. 2.Shnfad Ramrao Pimple

  3. 3.Shobhabai Shenfad Pimple

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    A. D. R.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    A. D. R.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    A. D. R.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  7. 07-Nov-2025

    Issues

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  8. 19-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  9. 06-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  10. 27-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  11. 07-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  12. 14-Feb-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  13. 10-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 225/2024 The court vacated the default order ("kaifiyat") issued against the respondent and allowed the respondent's petition on merits. The respondent had failed to file the required statement within 90 days due to legitimate reasons (adult respondent was away for medical treatment), and the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and admit the statement on record to allow the case to proceed on its substantive merits. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 10-Jan-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  15. 03-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  16. 04-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  17. 25-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  18. 17-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  19. 05-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  20. 23-Jul-2024

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  21. 24-Jun-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  22. 04-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 04-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 225/2024 The court vacated the default order ("kaifiyat") issued against the respondent and allowed the respondent's petition on merits. The respondent had failed to file the required statement within 90 days due to legitimate reasons (adult respondent was away for medical treatment), and the court found it appropriate to condone the delay and admit the statement on record to allow the case to proceed on its substantive merits. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 200 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case