Mohammad Rafik Mohammad Ashfak and 4 vs Shaikh Najir Shaikh Iliyas and 6 Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S. — 100/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Awaiting Report of Commissioner. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060004572022

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

Next Hearing

05th August 2026

Filing Number

150/2022

Filing Date

24-02-2022

Registration No

100/2022

Registration Date

24-02-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Mohammad Rafik Mohammad Ashfak and 4

Adv. JADHAV S.B.

Mohammad Khaled Ashfak

Mohammad Jahed Mohammad Ashfak

Shaikh Musa Shaikh Ashfak

Respondent(s)

Shaikh Najir Shaikh Iliyas and 6 Advocate - DESHPANDE M.S.

Shaikh Ajij Shaikh Iliyas

Mohammad Idris Mohammad Isa

Adv. NAWAB H.A.

Faimunisa Begum Rafik

Mohammad Mumtaj Mohammad Ashraf

Adv. NAWAB H.A.

Mohammad Jafar Mohammad Mushtak

Adv. NAWAB H.A.

Mohammad Ramis Mohammad Rais

Adv. NAWAB H.A.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

07-05-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

16-03-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

18-02-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

13-01-2026

Awaiting Report of Commissioner

08-12-2025

Steps_Unready

Interim Orders

20-04-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No. 100/2022 Outcome: The court allowed the application and set aside the "No Written Statement" order against Original Plaintiffs 1-5, finding their reasons for delay justifiable. The plaintiffs must pay ₹200 cost to the Counter Claimant by the next date, enabling them to file their written statement and have the possession case decided on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 100/2022 Outcome: The court allowed the application and set aside the "No Written Statement" order against Original Plaintiffs 1-5, finding their reasons for delay justifiable. The plaintiffs must pay ₹200 cost to the Counter Claimant by the next date, enabling them to file their written statement and have the possession case decided on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case