Sunil Sominath Shelke vs The State Of Maharashtra — 38/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN060004162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

316/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

38/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

47

Police Station

Hasnabad

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Sominath Shelke

Adv. ADV MISAL SHITAL KAILASRAO

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

24-03-2026

Reply/Say

23-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

17-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 38/2026 (Sunil Sominath Shelke v. State of Maharashtra) The court allowed the applicant's petition to recover interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trolley, finding the applicant was the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts verified by the investigating officer. While rejecting the prosecution's argument that return would enable illegal use, the court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or unauthorized use, mandatory trolley registration within one month, and production of the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 38/2026 (Sunil Sominath Shelke v. State of Maharashtra) The court allowed the applicant's petition to recover interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trolley, finding the applicant was the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts verified by the investigating officer. While rejecting the prosecution's argument that return would enable illegal use, the court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or unauthorized use, mandatory trolley registration within one month, and production of the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case