Sunil Sominath Shelke vs The State Of Maharashtra — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN060004162026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
316/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Hasnabad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sunil Sominath Shelke
Adv. ADV MISAL SHITAL KAILASRAO
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 23-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 38/2026 (Sunil Sominath Shelke v. State of Maharashtra) The court allowed the applicant's petition to recover interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trolley, finding the applicant was the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts verified by the investigating officer. While rejecting the prosecution's argument that return would enable illegal use, the court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or unauthorized use, mandatory trolley registration within one month, and production of the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 38/2026 (Sunil Sominath Shelke v. State of Maharashtra) The court allowed the applicant's petition to recover interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trolley, finding the applicant was the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts verified by the investigating officer. While rejecting the prosecution's argument that return would enable illegal use, the court imposed stringent conditions: Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or unauthorized use, mandatory trolley registration within one month, and production of the vehicle as required by court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts