Krushana Raju Rokade vs The State Of Maharashtra — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN060003762026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
280/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
Bhokardan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krushana Raju Rokade
Adv. Ganesh Thombre
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 36/2026 Krushna Raju Rokade v. The State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Sonalika tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him to be the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until the trailer is registered within one month, and mandatory production before the court as required, while directing police to prepare detailed panchanama records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 36/2026 Krushna Raju Rokade v. The State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Sonalika tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him to be the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until the trailer is registered within one month, and mandatory production before the court as required, while directing police to prepare detailed panchanama records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts