Nur Ahemad Shaha Laddu Shaha vs The State Of Maharashtra — 31/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN060003412026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

31/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

59

Police Station

Bhokardan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Nur Ahemad Shaha Laddu Shaha

Adv. Ganesh Thombre

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 31/2026 Noor Ahemad Shah Laddu Shah v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea for interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until registration is completed within one month, and production of vehicles as required, reasoning that property deteriorates unused in police custody and the prosecution provided no legitimate basis for continued retention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 31/2026 Noor Ahemad Shah Laddu Shah v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea for interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until registration is completed within one month, and production of vehicles as required, reasoning that property deteriorates unused in police custody and the prosecution provided no legitimate basis for continued retention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case