Nur Ahemad Shaha Laddu Shaha vs The State Of Maharashtra — 31/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN060003412026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
256/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
59
Police Station
Bhokardan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nur Ahemad Shaha Laddu Shaha
Adv. Ganesh Thombre
Respondent(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 31/2026 Noor Ahemad Shah Laddu Shah v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea for interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until registration is completed within one month, and production of vehicles as required, reasoning that property deteriorates unused in police custody and the prosecution provided no legitimate basis for continued retention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.MA No. 31/2026 Noor Ahemad Shah Laddu Shah v. State of Maharashtra The court allowed the applicant's plea for interim custody of a seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer, finding him the rightful owner based on vehicle registration documents and purchase receipts. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on alienation or use until registration is completed within one month, and production of vehicles as required, reasoning that property deteriorates unused in police custody and the prosecution provided no legitimate basis for continued retention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts