Manda Appasaheb Sherkar vs The State Of Maharashtra — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN060003322026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

581

Police Station

Bhokardan

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manda Appasaheb Sherkar

    Adv. SHINDE RAHUL ASHOKRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Manda Appasaheb Sherkar v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.MA No. 30/2026) Decision: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer to the applicant, establishing that as the rightful owner (evidenced by registration certificate and purchase receipt), she should not suffer loss from the property remaining unused in police custody. Key Conditions: The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 8,00,000, register the trailer within one month, not alienate or transfer the vehicles, not use the trailer until registration, and produce the vehicles when required by the court. Reasoning: The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that owners shouldn't suffer from seized property deteriorating unused, and applied Bombay High Court principles allowing return of unregistered vehicles subject to stringent conditions preventing illegal use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  12. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Manda Appasaheb Sherkar v. State of Maharashtra (Cri.MA No. 30/2026) Decision: The court allowed the application and granted interim custody of the seized Mahindra tractor and unregistered trailer to the applicant, establishing that as the rightful owner (evidenced by registration certificate and purchase receipt), she should not suffer loss from the property remaining unused in police custody. Key Conditions: The applicant must execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 8,00,000, register the trailer within one month, not alienate or transfer the vehicles, not use the trailer until registration, and produce the vehicles when required by the court. Reasoning: The court relied on Supreme Court precedent that owners shouldn't suffer from seized property deteriorating unused, and applied Bombay High Court principles allowing return of unregistered vehicles subject to stringent conditions preventing illegal use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case