Sumanbai Rameshwar Korake vs Nil — 17/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 3,7. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN060001432026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

30/2026

Filing Date

19-01-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 3,7

Petitioner(s)

Sumanbai Rameshwar Korake

Adv. Ganesh Thombre

Pawan Rameshwar Korake

Adv. Ganesh Thombre

Sunita Suresh Fadat

Adv. Ganesh Thombre

Mandabai Sahebrao Korake

Adv. Ganesh Thombre

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

27-02-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Civil MA 17/2026 The court granted a Heirship Certificate to the applicants (Sumanbai, Pawan, and Sunita) recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of deceased Rameshwar Sahebrao Korke, who died on 21.10.2025. The court found their unchallenged testimony, supported by death certificate and Aadhar cards, sufficient to establish their heirship under Bombay Regulations VIII of 1827, noting no objections were raised despite public proclamation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil MA 17/2026 The court granted a Heirship Certificate to the applicants (Sumanbai, Pawan, and Sunita) recognizing them as the sole legal heirs of deceased Rameshwar Sahebrao Korke, who died on 21.10.2025. The court found their unchallenged testimony, supported by death certificate and Aadhar cards, sufficient to establish their heirship under Bombay Regulations VIII of 1827, noting no objections were raised despite public proclamation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case