MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL vs AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1. — 11/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060000812025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-12-2024

Filing Number

25/2025

Filing Date

07-01-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

07-01-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 31,34,38

Petitioner(s)

MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL

Adv. SHINDE S. A.

RAMESHWAR PRALHAD MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

ISHWAR PRALHAD MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

SHIVDAS PRALHAD MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

BHAGWAN PRALHAD MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

SWATI DATTU UBALE

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

Respondent(s)

AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1.

ANUSAYABAI AVCHITRAO MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.

YOGESH AVCHOTRAO MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.

ANITA AVCHOTRAO MISAL

Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

ARUN TEJRAO MISAL

DWARKABAI SUBHASH BAWASKAR

SUMANBAI GOVIND POLADKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..

24-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

31-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Appearance

06-02-2026

Appearance

19-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

19-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case