MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL vs AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1. — 11/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060000812025

e-Filing Number

26-12-2024

Filing Number

25/2025

Filing Date

07-Jan-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

07-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 31,34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL

    Adv. SHINDE S. A.

  2. 2.RAMESHWAR PRALHAD MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

  3. 3.ISHWAR PRALHAD MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

  4. 4.SHIVDAS PRALHAD MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

  5. 5.BHAGWAN PRALHAD MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

  6. 6.SWATI DATTU UBALE

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1.

  2. 2.ANUSAYABAI AVCHITRAO MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.

  3. 3.YOGESH AVCHOTRAO MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.

  4. 4.ANITA AVCHOTRAO MISAL

    Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO

  5. 5.ARUN TEJRAO MISAL

  6. 6.DWARKABAI SUBHASH BAWASKAR

  7. 7.SUMANBAI GOVIND POLADKAR

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  9. 30-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  11. 13-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  12. 02-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  13. 19-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  14. 05-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  15. 05-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  16. 20-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan..

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 07-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case