MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL vs AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1. — 11/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 31,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN060000812025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-12-2024
Filing Number
25/2025
Filing Date
07-01-2025
Registration No
11/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANDABAI PRALHAD MISAL
Adv. SHINDE S. A.
RAMESHWAR PRALHAD MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
ISHWAR PRALHAD MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
SHIVDAS PRALHAD MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
BHAGWAN PRALHAD MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
SWATI DATTU UBALE
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
Respondent(s)
AVCHOTRAO TEJRAO MISAL Advocate - SABLE S.M.1.
ANUSAYABAI AVCHITRAO MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.
YOGESH AVCHOTRAO MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO1.
ANITA AVCHOTRAO MISAL
Adv. DABHADE PRADEEP BALAJIRAO
ARUN TEJRAO MISAL
DWARKABAI SUBHASH BAWASKAR
SUMANBAI GOVIND POLADKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. BHOKARDAN..
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 31-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 06-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 19-01-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 11/2025 (Mandabai v. Avchitrao) Outcome: The defendants' application to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court rejected arguments that the plaintiff had improperly joined parties and failed to include necessary properties (Gat nos. 303, 302, 304) in this partition suit. The court held that plaint rejection under CPC Order VII Rule 11 requires specific grounds (lack of cause of action, undervaluation, or procedural non-compliance), and disputes over which properties should be included and which defendants are necessary are matters for trial adjudication, not preliminary rejection. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts