Mohanlal Harji Patel vs Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate - JADHAV D. S. — 2/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN060000342026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan
Judge
2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohanlal Harji Patel
Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande
Chhaganlal Gopal Vasani
Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande
Chetana Dilip Vasani
Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande
Pratik Dilip Vasani
Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande
Gayatri Dilip Vasani
Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate - JADHAV D. S.
Sindhubai Ramesh Kad
Ramesh Shanfad Sonwane
Shankar Ramesh Kad
Rahul Dipak Rathi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
No W.S. Order
No W.S. Order
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-04-2026 | No W.S. Order |
| 06-04-2026 | No W.S. Order |
| 30-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. 02/2026 - Mohanlal Harji Patel et al. v. Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate et al. The plaintiff's application for ad interim injunction against defendants 6 and 7 to prevent creation of third-party interests in a property sale deed (dated 11.04.1997) was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff's main relief sought rectification of the sale deed between defendants 2 and 3, and the documents and ownership evidence produced on record were insufficient to establish grounds for granting the interim injunction under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. 02/2026 - Mohanlal Harji Patel et al. v. Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate et al. The plaintiff's application for ad interim injunction against defendants 6 and 7 to prevent creation of third-party interests in a property sale deed (dated 11.04.1997) was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff's main relief sought rectification of the sale deed between defendants 2 and 3, and the documents and ownership evidence produced on record were insufficient to establish grounds for granting the interim injunction under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts