Mohanlal Harji Patel vs Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate - JADHAV D. S. — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN060000342026

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Bhokardan

Judge

2-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohanlal Harji Patel

    Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande

  2. 2.Chhaganlal Gopal Vasani

    Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande

  3. 3.Chetana Dilip Vasani

    Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande

  4. 4.Pratik Dilip Vasani

    Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande

  5. 5.Gayatri Dilip Vasani

    Adv. Manoj Subhashrao Deshpande

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate - JADHAV D. S.

  2. 2.Sindhubai Ramesh Kad

  3. 3.Ramesh Shanfad Sonwane

  4. 4.Shankar Ramesh Kad

  5. 5.Rahul Dipak Rathi

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  3. 06-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: R.C.S. 02/2026 - Mohanlal Harji Patel et al. v. Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate et al. The plaintiff's application for ad interim injunction against defendants 6 and 7 to prevent creation of third-party interests in a property sale deed (dated 11.04.1997) was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff's main relief sought rectification of the sale deed between defendants 2 and 3, and the documents and ownership evidence produced on record were insufficient to establish grounds for granting the interim injunction under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    No W.S. Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  11. 04-Mar-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Bhokardan.

  14. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 02/2026 - Mohanlal Harji Patel et al. v. Ramesh Kisan Kad Advocate et al. The plaintiff's application for ad interim injunction against defendants 6 and 7 to prevent creation of third-party interests in a property sale deed (dated 11.04.1997) was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff's main relief sought rectification of the sale deed between defendants 2 and 3, and the documents and ownership evidence produced on record were insufficient to establish grounds for granting the interim injunction under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case