Bahulabai Vinayak Pawar vs Sanjay Sitaram Rathod Advocate - MAGAR K.S. — 182/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050016652022
Filing Number
306/2022
Filing Date
25-11-2022
Registration No
182/2022
Registration Date
25-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bahulabai Vinayak Pawar
Adv. VAIDYA S B
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Sitaram Rathod Advocate - MAGAR K.S.
Anjana Ram Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Disposed
Appearance
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 24-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
| 06-10-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed the suit in favor of petitioner Bahulabai Vinayak Pawar against respondent Sanjay Sitaram Rathod based on a compromise settlement reached through mediation. Both parties voluntarily accepted the compromise terms (Exh. 17), which the court verified as legal and valid, and the suit was disposed of accordingly with the compromise forming part of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decreed the suit in favor of petitioner Bahulabai Vinayak Pawar against respondent Sanjay Sitaram Rathod based on a compromise settlement reached through mediation. Both parties voluntarily accepted the compromise terms (Exh. 17), which the court verified as legal and valid, and the suit was disposed of accordingly with the compromise forming part of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts