Dattatray Bhimrao Bilhare vs Deogiri Nagari Cooperative Society Ltd. Jalna Branch Partur Advocate - JAWLEKAR A A — 39/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Disposed: Contested--PLAINT REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN050007092025

e-Filing Number

21-06-2025

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

39/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

1-Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PLAINT REJECTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Bhimrao Bilhare

    Adv. AMBHURE R. B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deogiri Nagari Cooperative Society Ltd. Jalna Branch Partur Advocate - JAWLEKAR A A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking perpetual injunction against the cooperative society's auction of his mortgaged agricultural land, finding it lacked jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court concluded that disputes involving members and cooperative societies regarding loan recovery must be referred to the Co-operative Court under Sections 91, 163, and 164 of the Act, not civil courts, as the plaintiff's dispute fell within the "business of society." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  13. 03-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  14. 02-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  16. 06-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  17. 03-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  19. 10-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  20. 26-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  21. 10-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  22. 30-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  24. 06-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  25. 31-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  26. 14-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  27. 09-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  28. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the plaintiff's suit seeking perpetual injunction against the cooperative society's auction of his mortgaged agricultural land, finding it lacked jurisdiction under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court concluded that disputes involving members and cooperative societies regarding loan recovery must be referred to the Co-operative Court under Sections 91, 163, and 164 of the Act, not civil courts, as the plaintiff's dispute fell within the "business of society." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case