Vijaymala Subhash Wadmare vs Dnyanoba Vitthal Gaikwad Advocate - SOLANKE M.R. — 38/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050007082025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-06-2025
Filing Number
121/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijaymala Subhash Wadmare
Adv. VAIDYA S B
Respondent(s)
Dnyanoba Vitthal Gaikwad Advocate - SOLANKE M.R.
Rukhminbai Vitthal Gaikwad
Namdev Dnyanoba Gaikwad
Gautam Dnyanoba Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Jt. Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Compliance
Order on Exh
A. D. R.
A. D. R.
A. D. R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 24-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | A. D. R. |
| 21-02-2026 | A. D. R. |
| 09-02-2026 | A. D. R. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 38/2025 Petitioner: Vijaymala Subhash Wadmare Respondents: Dnyanoba Vitthal Gaikwad (Advocate), Rukhminbai Vitthal Gaikwad, Namdev Dnyanoba Gaikwad Outcome: The court partially granted the respondents' applications for condonation of delay in filing written replies. Respondents 1 & 2 were permitted to file their reply after paying ₹700 as court costs, and Respondents 3 & 4 were permitted to file their reply after paying ₹500 as court costs. The applications were approved despite delays (65 days for respondents 1-2; 27 days for respondents 3-4), considering the respondents' advanced age and health issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 38/2025 Petitioner: Vijaymala Subhash Wadmare Respondents: Dnyanoba Vitthal Gaikwad (Advocate), Rukhminbai Vitthal Gaikwad, Namdev Dnyanoba Gaikwad Outcome: The court partially granted the respondents' applications for condonation of delay in filing written replies. Respondents 1 & 2 were permitted to file their reply after paying ₹700 as court costs, and Respondents 3 & 4 were permitted to file their reply after paying ₹500 as court costs. The applications were approved despite delays (65 days for respondents 1-2; 27 days for respondents 3-4), considering the respondents' advanced age and health issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts