The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur vs Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid — 171/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),189(2),191(2),191(3),190. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN050006312025

Filing Number

533/2025

Filing Date

11-Jun-2025

Registration No

171/2025

Registration Date

12-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

1-Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

534

Police Station

PARTUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),189(2),191(2),191(3),190

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid

  2. 2.Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid

  3. 3.Somnath Bhagwan Jaid

  4. 4.Kiran Bhagwan Jaid

  5. 5.Pralhad Sanjay Kharat

  6. 6.Atish Radhakisan Radgaonkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Charge

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Charge

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Charge

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Charge

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 11-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 171/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case