The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur vs Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid — 171/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),189(2),191(2),191(3),190. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN050006312025

Case disposed

Filing Number

533/2025

Filing Date

11-06-2025

Registration No

171/2025

Registration Date

12-06-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

534

Police Station

PARTUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),189(2),191(2),191(3),190

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid

Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid

Somnath Bhagwan Jaid

Kiran Bhagwan Jaid

Pralhad Sanjay Kharat

Atish Radhakisan Radgaonkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

04-05-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

02-03-2026

Charge

17-02-2026

Charge

Final Orders / Judgements

04-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case