The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur vs Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid — 171/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),189(2),191(2),191(3),190. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN050006312025
Filing Number
533/2025
Filing Date
11-Jun-2025
Registration No
171/2025
Registration Date
12-Jun-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
534
Police Station
PARTUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid
-
2.Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid
-
3.Somnath Bhagwan Jaid
-
4.Kiran Bhagwan Jaid
-
5.Pralhad Sanjay Kharat
-
6.Atish Radhakisan Radgaonkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
02-Mar-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
17-Feb-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
31-Jan-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
23-Jan-2026
Charge
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
16-Dec-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
12-Nov-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
22-Sep-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2025
Case Summary: Criminal Case 171/2025 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all six accused (Laxminarayan Bhagwan Jaid, Bhagwan Ganpatrao Jaid, Somnath Bhagwan Jaid, Kiran Bhagwan Jaid, Pralhad Sanjay Kharat, and Atish Radhakisan Radgavkar) of charges under IPC Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 118(1), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and related sections, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged rioting and assault. Key Reasoning: The court found that the complainant and injured witnesses contradicted the prosecution's narrative during their testimony and subsequently settled out of court with the accused. Without credible eyewitness testimony establishing the alleged offenses, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite the accused accepting certain circumstantial evidence like scene-of-crime panchnama and seized weapons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts