Tai Alias Nita Vikas Bhesar vs Vikas Tarachand Bhesar Advocate - BAGAL J. P. — 25/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Supply of Copies. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Supply of Copies Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHJN050004732025

e-Filing Number

02-05-2025

Filing Number

83/2025

Filing Date

02-May-2025

Registration No

25/2025

Registration Date

03-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

1-Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tai Alias Nita Vikas Bhesar

    Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.

  2. 2.Mayur Vikas Bhesar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Tarachand Bhesar Advocate - BAGAL J. P.

  2. 2.Tarachand Ashraji Bhesar

  3. 3.Lata Tarachand Bhesar

  4. 4.Vaishali Ganesh Vadekar

  5. 5.Mamtabai Ashraji Bhesar

  6. 6.Paraji Ashraji Bhesar

  7. 7.Ajabrao Ashraji Bhesar

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Supply of Copies

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Supply of Copies

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Supply of Copies

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Supply of Copies

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  9. 29-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: Civil Case 25/2025 The court partially granted a temporary injunction request in a family property partition dispute. Petitioners Tai (Nita) and Mayur Bhesar sought to prevent transfer of ancestral properties (agricultural land in Ghat 303 and 31, and residential property 21/1) pending final judgment. The court found credible evidence that the disputed properties constitute ancestral joint Hindu family assets inherited by the respondents, establishing a serious disputed question requiring court protection. However, the court rejected the injunction regarding one agricultural plot (Ghat 303) as the petitioners failed to sufficiently prove their entitlement. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from transferring or selling the agricultural property (Ghat 31) and residential property (21/1) until final case resolution, finding the balance of hardship favors the petitioners' protection of these ancestral assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 05-Nov-2025

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  12. 16-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  16. 04-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  18. 23-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  19. 22-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  21. 18-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  22. 15-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  23. 03-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  24. 25-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  25. 18-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  26. 14-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  27. 12-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  28. 11-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  29. 08-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  30. 07-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  31. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  32. 24-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge (J.d.) and J.m.f.c., Partur

  33. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 02-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Civil Case 25/2025 The court partially granted a temporary injunction request in a family property partition dispute. Petitioners Tai (Nita) and Mayur Bhesar sought to prevent transfer of ancestral properties (agricultural land in Ghat 303 and 31, and residential property 21/1) pending final judgment. The court found credible evidence that the disputed properties constitute ancestral joint Hindu family assets inherited by the respondents, establishing a serious disputed question requiring court protection. However, the court rejected the injunction regarding one agricultural plot (Ghat 303) as the petitioners failed to sufficiently prove their entitlement. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from transferring or selling the agricultural property (Ghat 31) and residential property (21/1) until final case resolution, finding the balance of hardship favors the petitioners' protection of these ancestral assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case