Tai Alias Nita Vikas Bhesar vs Vikas Tarachand Bhesar Advocate - BAGAL J. P. — 25/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,39. Status: Supply of Copies. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHJN050004732025
Next Hearing
27th July 2026
e-Filing Number
02-05-2025
Filing Number
83/2025
Filing Date
02-05-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tai Alias Nita Vikas Bhesar
Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.
Mayur Vikas Bhesar
Respondent(s)
Vikas Tarachand Bhesar Advocate - BAGAL J. P.
Tarachand Ashraji Bhesar
Lata Tarachand Bhesar
Vaishali Ganesh Vadekar
Mamtabai Ashraji Bhesar
Paraji Ashraji Bhesar
Ajabrao Ashraji Bhesar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Supply of Copies
Supply of Copies
Supply of Copies
Supply of Copies
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Supply of Copies |
| 28-04-2026 | Supply of Copies |
| 16-03-2026 | Supply of Copies |
| 02-03-2026 | Supply of Copies |
| 12-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: Civil Case 25/2025 The court partially granted a temporary injunction request in a family property partition dispute. Petitioners Tai (Nita) and Mayur Bhesar sought to prevent transfer of ancestral properties (agricultural land in Ghat 303 and 31, and residential property 21/1) pending final judgment. The court found credible evidence that the disputed properties constitute ancestral joint Hindu family assets inherited by the respondents, establishing a serious disputed question requiring court protection. However, the court rejected the injunction regarding one agricultural plot (Ghat 303) as the petitioners failed to sufficiently prove their entitlement. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from transferring or selling the agricultural property (Ghat 31) and residential property (21/1) until final case resolution, finding the balance of hardship favors the petitioners' protection of these ancestral assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Civil Case 25/2025 The court partially granted a temporary injunction request in a family property partition dispute. Petitioners Tai (Nita) and Mayur Bhesar sought to prevent transfer of ancestral properties (agricultural land in Ghat 303 and 31, and residential property 21/1) pending final judgment. The court found credible evidence that the disputed properties constitute ancestral joint Hindu family assets inherited by the respondents, establishing a serious disputed question requiring court protection. However, the court rejected the injunction regarding one agricultural plot (Ghat 303) as the petitioners failed to sufficiently prove their entitlement. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining respondents from transferring or selling the agricultural property (Ghat 31) and residential property (21/1) until final case resolution, finding the balance of hardship favors the petitioners' protection of these ancestral assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts