Sundarrao Bapu Ubale vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur Advocate - APP — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN050003102026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
238/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
PARTUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sundarrao Bapu Ubale
Adv. DESHMUKH M. I.
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Disposed
Arguments
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sundarrao Bapu Ubale v. State of Maharashtra (38/2026) The court granted Sundarrao Ubale's application to release his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle on supratnama bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, despite the State's opposition based on serious charges under BNS 2023. The court reasoned that mere vehicle involvement in crime cannot justify indefinite custody, and proper conditions—including prohibitions on sale, alteration, or criminal use, and requirements for vehicle production during investigation—adequately protect investigative interests while allowing the verified owner to preserve his property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sundarrao Bapu Ubale v. State of Maharashtra (38/2026) The court granted Sundarrao Ubale's application to release his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle on supratnama bond of Rs. 10 lakhs, despite the State's opposition based on serious charges under BNS 2023. The court reasoned that mere vehicle involvement in crime cannot justify indefinite custody, and proper conditions—including prohibitions on sale, alteration, or criminal use, and requirements for vehicle production during investigation—adequately protect investigative interests while allowing the verified owner to preserve his property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts