Shri Samarth Traders Pro Pra Prabhakar Dnyanoba Supekar vs The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur Advocate - APP — 34/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHJN050002902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

221/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur

Judge

1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

PARTUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Shri Samarth Traders Pro Pra Prabhakar Dnyanoba Supekar

Adv. LIMBULKAR R.L.

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Partur Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur

10-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Order

08-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

06-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court rejected Shri Samarth Traders' application seeking release of seized mobile phones, earbuds, and silver earrings under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed ownership of the items, contending they were purchased by the accused using Rs. 10 lakh stolen from his shop, but the court found insufficient documentary evidence to prove either his ownership of the seized items or that they were purchased from the stolen amount, holding that releasing them would create difficulties during trial proceedings while investigation is ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Shri Samarth Traders' application seeking release of seized mobile phones, earbuds, and silver earrings under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed ownership of the items, contending they were purchased by the accused using Rs. 10 lakh stolen from his shop, but the court found insufficient documentary evidence to prove either his ownership of the seized items or that they were purchased from the stolen amount, holding that releasing them would create difficulties during trial proceedings while investigation is ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Partur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case