Arefa Saddam Qureshi vs Saddam Esmail Qureshi Advocate - SHAIKH S.A. — 111/2021
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN050002482021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
205/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
111/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arefa Saddam Qureshi
Adv. QUAZI M. N.
Respondent(s)
Saddam Esmail Qureshi Advocate - SHAIKH S.A.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Appearance
Appearance
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 15-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 17-04-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 25-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 111/2021 - Arefa Saddam Qureshi v. Saddam Esmail Qureshi Outcome: The court partially granted the petitioner's application for interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent (husband) was ordered to pay Rs. 2,500/- per month as interim alimony to the petitioner (wife) from the date of filing the case (03.03.2021) until the final determination of the main case. The court found the petitioner entitled to maintenance given her financial dependence and lack of independent income, while the respondent has multiple sources of income totaling approximately Rs. 75,000/- monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 111/2021 - Arefa Saddam Qureshi v. Saddam Esmail Qureshi Outcome: The court partially granted the petitioner's application for interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondent (husband) was ordered to pay Rs. 2,500/- per month as interim alimony to the petitioner (wife) from the date of filing the case (03.03.2021) until the final determination of the main case. The court found the petitioner entitled to maintenance given her financial dependence and lack of independent income, while the respondent has multiple sources of income totaling approximately Rs. 75,000/- monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts