Shaikh Mainoddin Shaikh Shahaboddin vs Sajedali Khan Sarfarajali Khan Kayamkhani Advocate - LIMBULKAR R.L. — 13/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section -. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050001442022
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
22/2022
Filing Date
28-01-2022
Registration No
13/2022
Registration Date
28-01-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Mainoddin Shaikh Shahaboddin
Respondent(s)
Sajedali Khan Sarfarajali Khan Kayamkhani Advocate - LIMBULKAR R.L.
Mo Abdul maruf Mo.Abdul Moin Khan
Adv. JAWLEKAR A A
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 11-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 13/2022 Defendant No. 1 filed an application to set aside a no-written-statement (W.S.) order against him in a property dispute involving cancellation of sale deed and separate possession. The court allowed the application, accepting the defendant's explanation that his wife's pregnancy caused the delay in filing his written statement. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 500/- to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff as a compensatory measure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 13/2022 Defendant No. 1 filed an application to set aside a no-written-statement (W.S.) order against him in a property dispute involving cancellation of sale deed and separate possession. The court allowed the application, accepting the defendant's explanation that his wife's pregnancy caused the delay in filing his written statement. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 500/- to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff as a compensatory measure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts