Nitin Pandit Garad vs Gayabai Achyut Garad Advocate - AMBHURE R. B. — 3/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN050000572021
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
7/2021
Filing Date
18-01-2021
Registration No
3/2021
Registration Date
18-01-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Partur
Judge
1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Pandit Garad
Adv. MASKE N. M.
Respondent(s)
Gayabai Achyut Garad Advocate - AMBHURE R. B.
Prabhakar Achyut Garad
Adv. AMBHURE R. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge (J.D.) and J.M.F.C., Partur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 21-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Nitin Pandit Garad v. Gayabai Achyut Garad (RCS 3/2021) The Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Partur granted the plaintiff's temporary injunction application on 21 January 2022. The court found that plaintiff Nitin Pandit Garad established a prima facie case of ownership and possession of property No. 439 (900 sq.ft.) at Singona, Taluka Partur, supported by certified Form 08 records and photographs showing the defendants illegally erected tin fencing on his open plot. Defendants Gayabai Achyut Garad and Prabhakar Achyut Garad were temporarily restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession or alienating the property until final disposal of the suit. Plaintiff was awarded cost in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Nitin Pandit Garad v. Gayabai Achyut Garad (RCS 3/2021) The Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Partur granted the plaintiff's temporary injunction application on 21 January 2022. The court found that plaintiff Nitin Pandit Garad established a prima facie case of ownership and possession of property No. 439 (900 sq.ft.) at Singona, Taluka Partur, supported by certified Form 08 records and photographs showing the defendants illegally erected tin fencing on his open plot. Defendants Gayabai Achyut Garad and Prabhakar Achyut Garad were temporarily restrained from obstructing plaintiff's possession or alienating the property until final disposal of the suit. Plaintiff was awarded cost in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts