Kishor laxman kajale vs Nill — 247/2025
Case under Bombay Reorganisation Act Section 2and7. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHJN040030312025
e-Filing Number
16-12-2025
Filing Number
1021/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
247/2025
Registration Date
17-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kishor laxman kajale
Adv. Adv. M.M. Patel
-
2.Anil Laxman kajale
Adv. Adv. M.M. Patel
-
3.Sunil Laxman kajale
Adv. Adv. M.M. Patel
-
4.Sharda dipak chahare
Adv. Adv. M.M. Patel
-
5.Sachin ramnath kajale
Adv. Adv. M.M. Patel
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nill
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 247/2025 Summary The court granted a heirship certificate to five applicants (grandsons and granddaughter of deceased Yamaji Kondiram Kajale) under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827. The applicants established they were the only legal heirs through affidavits, verified death certificates, and Aadhar cards, with no objections filed during the public notice period. The court found sufficient evidence of their heirship and issued the certificate to enable registration of their names in government and semi-government offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad
-
23-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 247/2025
Case 247/2025 Summary The court granted a heirship certificate to five applicants (grandsons and granddaughter of deceased Yamaji Kondiram Kajale) under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827. The applicants established they were the only legal heirs through affidavits, verified death certificates, and Aadhar cards, with no objections filed during the public notice period. The court found sufficient evidence of their heirship and issued the certificate to enable registration of their names in government and semi-government offices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts