Sudhakar asmanrao maske (H.C.Time bound) vs Tirthraj rambhau jaykar Advocate - UDHAN VISHAL V. — 333/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHJN040026532024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
11-11-2024
Filing Number
1137/2024
Filing Date
19-11-2024
Registration No
333/2024
Registration Date
19-11-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhakar asmanrao maske (H.C.Time bound)
Adv. KULKARNI KEDAR RAOSAHEB
Respondent(s)
Tirthraj rambhau jaykar Advocate - UDHAN VISHAL V.
Ashabai tirthraj jaykar
Dadabhau rambhau jaykar
Rahul tirthraj jaykar
Pramod tirthraj jaykar
Gaurav dadabhau jaykar
Anjana dadabhau jaykar
Somnath rambhau jaykar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 08-06-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 07-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 04-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 02-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 333/2024 - Sudhakar Asmanrao Maske v. Tirthraj Rambhau Jaykar & Others Summary: The petitioner's application seeking an order to file an original agreement dated 27.03.2018 was dismissed. The court found that the original document could not be authenticated without the signatory's testimony, and since witness examination had not commenced, the court could not determine the authenticity of the agreement. The petition was dismissed as frivolous and filed only for delay tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 333/2024 - Sudhakar Asmanrao Maske v. Tirthraj Rambhau Jaykar & Others Summary: The petitioner's application seeking an order to file an original agreement dated 27.03.2018 was dismissed. The court found that the original document could not be authenticated without the signatory's testimony, and since witness examination had not commenced, the court could not determine the authenticity of the agreement. The petition was dismissed as frivolous and filed only for delay tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts