Kalyan Apparao Ubale vs Bharat Govrdhan Ubale Advocate - PAWSE R. D. — 292/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Order. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHJN040022182024

e-Filing Number

09-09-2024

Filing Number

977/2024

Filing Date

18-Sep-2024

Registration No

292/2024

Registration Date

18-Sep-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

6-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Order

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalyan Apparao Ubale

    Adv. SULANE P. N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Govrdhan Ubale Advocate - PAWSE R. D.

  2. 2.Govardhan Apparao Ubale

  3. 3.Sharad Govardhan Ubale

  4. 4.Latabai Babasaheb Pachfule

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  6. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  7. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  8. 16-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  9. 17-Mar-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 292/2024 - Kalyan v. Bharat & Ors. Kalyan's application for permanent injunction to restrain defendants from obstructing his possession of agricultural land (Gat No. 26) in Jalna district was rejected on 17 March 2025. The court found no prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, noting that the latest 7/12 extract (land record) lists defendants as owners, not the plaintiff, and plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of his challenges to disputed mutation entries before revenue authorities. The court also found balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 17-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  11. 01-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  12. 10-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  13. 18-Dec-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 18-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  15. 13-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  16. 06-Dec-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  17. 25-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  18. 11-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  19. 21-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Court Ambad

  20. 21-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 18-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 292/2024 - Kalyan v. Bharat & Ors. Kalyan's application for permanent injunction to restrain defendants from obstructing his possession of agricultural land (Gat No. 26) in Jalna district was rejected on 17 March 2025. The court found no prima facie case in plaintiff's favor, noting that the latest 7/12 extract (land record) lists defendants as owners, not the plaintiff, and plaintiff failed to provide documentary evidence of his challenges to disputed mutation entries before revenue authorities. The court also found balance of convenience did not favor the plaintiff. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case