The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Ambad vs Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche — 374/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A),294,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHJN040021932022

Case disposed

Filing Number

1484/2022

Filing Date

07-10-2022

Registration No

374/2022

Registration Date

07-10-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

646

Police Station

Ambad

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A),294,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Ambad

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche

Vilas Baburao Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD

08-06-2026

Disposed

06-06-2026

Judgment

03-06-2026

Arguments

28-05-2026

Arguments

25-05-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-06-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 374/2022 Court Decision: Both accused (Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche and Vilas Baburao Jadhav) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A, 294, 504, and 506 read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found material deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Although the victim-informant testified to alleged assault, sexual harassment, obscene remarks, and threats, her testimony was not corroborated by available eyewitnesses (bus driver, conductor, or passengers who were admitted to be present). Critically, the investigating officer failed to record statements from any independent passengers or witnesses despite their presence. Available CCTV footage from the bus stand was not produced, and no medical evidence documented alleged injury marks despite the victim's claims. The court ruled that bare victim testimony without reliable corroboration, combined with withholding of best available evidence, fell short of the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 374/2022 Court Decision: Both accused (Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche and Vilas Baburao Jadhav) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A, 294, 504, and 506 read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found material deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Although the victim-informant testified to alleged assault, sexual harassment, obscene remarks, and threats, her testimony was not corroborated by available eyewitnesses (bus driver, conductor, or passengers who were admitted to be present). Critically, the investigating officer failed to record statements from any independent passengers or witnesses despite their presence. Available CCTV footage from the bus stand was not produced, and no medical evidence documented alleged injury marks despite the victim's claims. The court ruled that bare victim testimony without reliable corroboration, combined with withholding of best available evidence, fell short of the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case