The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Ambad vs Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche — 374/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354(A),294,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHJN040021932022
Filing Number
1484/2022
Filing Date
07-10-2022
Registration No
374/2022
Registration Date
07-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
646
Police Station
Ambad
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Ambad
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche
Vilas Baburao Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Jt. CJJD and JMFC COURT AMBAD
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-06-2026 | Judgment |
| 03-06-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-05-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 374/2022 Court Decision: Both accused (Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche and Vilas Baburao Jadhav) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A, 294, 504, and 506 read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found material deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Although the victim-informant testified to alleged assault, sexual harassment, obscene remarks, and threats, her testimony was not corroborated by available eyewitnesses (bus driver, conductor, or passengers who were admitted to be present). Critically, the investigating officer failed to record statements from any independent passengers or witnesses despite their presence. Available CCTV footage from the bus stand was not produced, and no medical evidence documented alleged injury marks despite the victim's claims. The court ruled that bare victim testimony without reliable corroboration, combined with withholding of best available evidence, fell short of the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 374/2022 Court Decision: Both accused (Chandrajeet Marotirao Gilche and Vilas Baburao Jadhav) were acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 354, 354-A, 294, 504, and 506 read with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The court found material deficiencies in the prosecution's case. Although the victim-informant testified to alleged assault, sexual harassment, obscene remarks, and threats, her testimony was not corroborated by available eyewitnesses (bus driver, conductor, or passengers who were admitted to be present). Critically, the investigating officer failed to record statements from any independent passengers or witnesses despite their presence. Available CCTV footage from the bus stand was not produced, and no medical evidence documented alleged injury marks despite the victim's claims. The court ruled that bare victim testimony without reliable corroboration, combined with withholding of best available evidence, fell short of the "beyond reasonable doubt" standard required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts