Canara Bank Br.Jamsamarth, Tq.Ghansawangi Dist.Jalna vs Sangeeta Suresh Rathod — 130/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 08th May 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN040018332023
Filing Number
651/2023
Filing Date
18-07-2023
Registration No
130/2023
Registration Date
18-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank Br.Jamsamarth, Tq.Ghansawangi Dist.Jalna
Adv. JHA A.N.
Respondent(s)
Sangeeta Suresh Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Appearance
Proclomation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 04-12-2025 | Proclomation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court decreed Canara Bank's suit in full, ordering defendant Sangeeta Suresh Rathod to pay Rs. 7,56,742/- with 9% per annum interest from filing date until realization within six months. The defendant had defaulted on a Rs. 3,00,000/- agricultural term loan disbursed in 2014, which became non-performing in 2018; the court proceeded ex parte after she failed to appear and rejected the bank's claimed 11.65% interest as excessive, substituting 9% instead. The bank is entitled to recover the amount through sale of the mortgaged agricultural property if payment isn't made within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court decreed Canara Bank's suit in full, ordering defendant Sangeeta Suresh Rathod to pay Rs. 7,56,742/- with 9% per annum interest from filing date until realization within six months. The defendant had defaulted on a Rs. 3,00,000/- agricultural term loan disbursed in 2014, which became non-performing in 2018; the court proceeded ex parte after she failed to appear and rejected the bank's claimed 11.65% interest as excessive, substituting 9% instead. The bank is entitled to recover the amount through sale of the mortgaged agricultural property if payment isn't made within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts