Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan vs Rameshwar Digamber Pawar — 46/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Uo34. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 09th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHJN040015322025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-05-2025

Filing Number

491/2025

Filing Date

01-07-2025

Registration No

46/2025

Registration Date

01-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad

Judge

14-Civil Judge Senior Division

Decision Date

09th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Uo34

Petitioner(s)

Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan

Adv. JHA ANAND NARAYAN

Respondent(s)

Rameshwar Digamber Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 14-Civil Judge Senior Division

09-06-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Evidence

27-01-2026

Appearance

04-12-2025

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

09-06-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case