Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan vs Rameshwar Digamber Pawar — 46/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Uo34. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 09th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN040015322025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
491/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan
Adv. JHA ANAND NARAYAN
Respondent(s)
Rameshwar Digamber Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Appearance
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 04-12-2025 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts