Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan vs Rameshwar Digamber Pawar — 46/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Uo34. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 09th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHJN040015322025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
491/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ambad
Judge
14-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank br. Samarth Through Sumit Bhimrao Govaradhan
Adv. JHA ANAND NARAYAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rameshwar Digamber Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Jan-2026
Appearance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Dec-2025
Public Notice/Proclamation
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
30-Sep-2025
Report
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2025
Case Summary: Canara Bank v. Rameshwar Digamber Pawar (46/2025) The Civil Court at Ambad decreed Canara Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 7,34,843 against defendant Rameshwar Pawar, a farmer who defaulted on a minor irrigation loan of Rs. 1,99,000 sanctioned in September 2016. The court found the defendant liable for the outstanding amount based on unchallenged bank evidence, the defendant's non-appearance, and signed loan documents. However, the court reduced the interest rate from the contracted 10.45% p.a. to 9% p.a., deeming the original rate exorbitant. The defendant must pay within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts